Opinion: Nigeria at 66, any hope in sight for Sports?
By Dayo Awoniyi
As Nigeria marks 66 years of independence, the question of what the country has achieved in sports and where the sector is heading deserves more than the usual celebration of medals, trophies and individual brilliance.
For six and a half decades, Nigerian sports have produced moments capable of uniting a deeply diverse nation. From Nojeim Maiyegun’s bronze medal at the Tokyo 1964 Olympics, Nigeria’s first Olympic medal, to the exploits of the Super Eagles, the Golden Eagles, D’Tigress, the Paralympians and a succession of world class athletes, the country has never lacked sporting talent.
But talent has rarely been the problem? The bigger question has always been whether Nigeria has built the system capable of consistently turning talent into sporting excellence, employment, infrastructure and economic value.
A glorious past, but an uneven journey as
Nigeria’s early post independence years showed considerable ambition. The country established formal structures for sports administration and, in 1973, introduced the National Sports Festival as a platform for talent identification, youth development and national integration. The National Institute for Sports was also established to develop the manpower required to drive the sector.
The 1970s through the 1990s subsequently produced some of the most memorable chapters in Nigerian sports. Nigeria hosted the 1973 All Africa Games and finished second on the overall medals table.
Shooting Stars became the first Nigerian club to win a major continental football trophy in 1976, while the country's football teams, athletes and boxers continued to make their mark internationally.
Then came the golden 1990s when the Super Eagles won the 1994 Africa Cup of Nations, reached the FIFA World Cup knockout stage later that year and rose to fifth in the FIFA rankings still the highest position achieved by an African men's national team. Two years later, Nigeria's Olympic football team stunned the world by winning gold at Atlanta 1996.
Yet the story became increasingly characterised by what could have been
a lack of continuity, deteriorating facilities, inadequate grassroots structures, inconsistent funding and administrative instability repeatedly interrupted the pipeline between talent discovery and elite performance.
A long running criticism of Nigerian sports administration has been that too much emphasis was placed on participating in competitions rather than developing a sustainable system for producing athletes and professionals.
The consequences were visible at Paris 2024, when Nigeria returned from the Olympic Games without a medal despite the Federal Government approving more than ₦12 billion for preparations and participation.
That result did not erase Nigeria's sporting talent. It exposed the gap between talent and the system supporting it.
Has something changed?
There is now a significant institutional change that deserves attention.
In October 2024,
President Bola Tinubu's administration scrapped the Federal Ministry of Sports Development and returned the National Sports Commission as the apex body responsible for sports administration. Shehu Dikko was appointed Chairman, with Bukola Olopade as Director-General.
The philosophy behind the restructuring is also different from the traditional medal counting approach.
The NSC has increasingly presented sports as an economic sector, with emphasis on athletes, infrastructure, investment, jobs, sports tourism and private-sector participation.
The numbers being presented by the Commission are significant.
According to the NSC, Nigeria recorded 373 medals across different sports in 2025, while more than 140,000 direct, indirect and induced jobs were created through sports-related activities.
The Commission also reported that sports contributed at least 1 per cent of GDP in each of the final two quarters of 2025, while setting an objective of eventually taking sports to at least 3 per cent of national GDP annually.
Those figures should be viewed as government reported performance indicators rather than the final verdict on the sector. Nevertheless, they indicate a deliberate attempt to measure sports not only by medals but also by economic activity and employment.
There has also been a noticeable push on infrastructure.
In 2026, the Federal Government approved the redevelopment of the Moshood Abiola National Stadium in Abuja, including the main football pitch and athletics track, while also approving a High Performance Centre, athletes' accommodation, swimming pool rehabilitation, additional training pitches, an anti-doping laboratory and improved sports medical facilities.
The Ahmadu Bello Stadium in Kaduna is another major example. Under an agreement between the NSC and Kaduna State Government, the stadium is being redeveloped with its capacity planned to rise from 12,000 to 32,000.
The NSC has also announced plans involving the National Stadium in Lagos and the Lekan Salami Stadium in Ibadan, while encouraging partnerships with state governments and private investors to rebuild sports infrastructure across the country.
The athletes are already providing evidence
Perhaps the clearest evidence that Nigerian sporting talent remains intact is what athletes have continued to accomplish when adequate preparation and competitive structures are available.
At the 2026 Commonwealth Games in Glasgow, Team Nigeria won 24 medals 10 gold, seven silver and seven bronze and finished seventh overall, emerging as the highest ranked African nation on the medal table. The medals came from para powerlifting, weightlifting, athletics, para athletics and judo.
The performance was particularly significant because it demonstrated that Nigeria's sporting potential extends far beyond football.
Nigeria's strength in sports such as para powerlifting, athletics, weightlifting, judo, scrabble and chess shows that the country possesses a much wider sporting ecosystem than the enormous attention traditionally given to the Super Eagles.
That broader approach matters?
For decades, Nigerian sports discussions have been dominated by football. Yet a sustainable sports economy cannot depend on one sport. It requires athletics, basketball, boxing, wrestling, weightlifting, swimming, tennis, combat sports, para-sports, school sports, sports medicine, coaching, officiating, sports technology, broadcasting, merchandising and sports tourism.
But the difficult questions remain the emergence of new infrastructure projects and increased funding does not automatically solve Nigeria's longstanding sports problems.
The most important test will be sustainability.
A stadium can be renovated today and deteriorate tomorrow if there is no maintenance culture. An athlete can receive funding for one competition and be forgotten afterwards. A talented teenager can win a school competition and disappear from the system if there is no pathway from school sports to clubs, academies, universities and national teams.
Nigeria therefore needs to move beyond the culture of emergency preparation before major competitions.
The 2024 Olympic experience is a reminder of what happens when preparation, administration and athlete support do not align. Conversely, the Commonwealth performance in 2026 provides an example of what Nigerian athletes can produce when several sporting disciplines receive structured attention.
Funding is another crucial issue. The 2025 sports budget was reported at more than ₦94.9 billion, compared with about ₦29.1 billion in 2024, representing a substantial increase. For 2026, the approved federal budget documents put the National Sports Commission's total allocation at about ₦210.03 billion, although the Commission had earlier sought a much larger envelope as part of its proposed long-term reset of the sector.
More money, however, must ultimately translate into measurable outcomes: functioning facilities, properly prepared athletes, coaches who are continuously trained, functioning grassroots competitions, transparent federation administration and careers that allow athletes to remain in sport without being forced out by financial hardship.
So, is there hope?
At 66, Nigeria's sports story is neither one of failure nor one of arrival.
The country has already demonstrated that it can produce champions. What has been missing for much of the post-independence era is the consistency of the system surrounding those champions.
The present period has introduced several measurable changes, the return of the National Sports Commission, increased budgetary attention, infrastructure redevelopment, an emphasis on the sports economy, reported job creation, broader support for non-football sports and a strong medal haul at the 2026 Commonwealth Games.
But the real test will not be how impressive the announcements of 2026 sound. It will be whether the facilities being rebuilt are still functional years from now; whether the 140,000 reported jobs become sustainable employment; whether the reported GDP contribution continues to grow and can be independently measured; whether school and grassroots sports regain their place in the development chain; and whether Nigerian athletes can consistently compete for medals at the Olympics, World Championships and other major global events.
Nigeria has never suffered from a shortage of sporting dreams. What the country needs is a system capable of turning those dreams into a permanent industry.
At 66, therefore, the most important question may not simply be whether there is hope in sight for Nigerian sports.
The more consequential question is whether Nigeria can finally build institutions strong enough to make that hope sustainable.